Previous Page  49 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 100 Next Page
Page Background

Competition principles:

help public

officers understand the benefits

of competition whilst highlighting

the “costs” of compromising

market competition.

Government par ticipation in

markets:

discuss how common types

of government participation in markets

may affect the competition process. It

will alsohelppublic officersunderstand

how proposed policies or regulatory

initiatives may distort competition.

This in turn motivates them to conduct

competition impact assessments of

their proposedpoliciesor initiatives. The

followingcommon typesof government

participationinmarketsandtheirpotential

impact on competition are covered:

a)

government as a seller or supplier;

b)

public procurement;

c)

government regulation;

d)

government influence; and

e)

taxes and subsidies.

Case studies from local and/ or

overseas policy making contexts:

i l l u s t r a t e h ow c omp e t i t i o n

considerations have helped to

shape policies or initiatives, and

in some cases, improve outcomes.

Other cases illustrate how a

failure to consider the impact on

competition led to unintended

consequences which undermined

policy or regulatory intent.

Summary of the Competition Act,

CCS’s role, and avenues to obtaining

advice fromCCS:

help public officers

gain a general understanding of the

Competition Act, CCS’s government

advisory process and what it entails,

and CCS’s information requirements

for assessments. Through this,

public officers are able to better

understand CCS’s advisory process,

and thus more easily prepare the

types of information required by CCS

to conduct a thorough assessment.

Tohelpgovernment agenciesunderstand thepotential impact of theirpoliciesandactivities

onmarket competition, CCSpublishedaset of Competition Impact Assessment Guidelines

for Government Agencies (the “Guidelines”) in 2008. Since then, CCS has dealt with a

variety of issues throughgovernment advisories and competition lawenforcement cases.

In2015, CCScarriedout areviewtoensure that theGuidelinesarekept updatedandrelevant

to real applications in local and overseas contexts. As part of the review, CCS sought the

perspectives of over 20 government agencies on existing Guidelines and how such a

competition toolkit would be used in their work. CCS also reviewed international practices

andmaterials issued by overseas jurisdictions to identify possible areas for improvement.

Following the review, CCS has developed a competition toolkit (“Toolkit”) for government

agencies tohelppublicofficersbetterunderstandcompetitionconceptsandtheCompetition

Act inSingapore, aswell as to providematerials for public officers to self-assesswhether

their proposed policies and initiatives are likely to raise competition concerns.

COMPETITION TOOLKIT FOR

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

MAJOR FEATURES OF THE TOOLKIT

The Toolkit replaces the Guidelines. The content from the Guidelines is updated and

included as part of the Toolkit. Additionally, the Toolkit covers the following newcontent:

47

CCS ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016

GUIDING YOU TO NEW HEIGHTS